Tag Archives: unity

Do Unto Others What You Do Not Want Them To Do To You

Yep, the golden rule, as shouted out with great excitement in a cross gen Bible study by a 6 year old some years back. And while the youngster got tongue tied and flipped Matthew 7:12 upside down, we all knew what he was referring to. In fact I’d go so far that pretty much every Christian, and even many non-Christians would understand what the six year old was trying to say.

Unlike the golden rule, where in the scriptures are well known, and pretty clear, vast multitudes of the scriptures are far from being that explicit and many can be pretty obscure, add in cultural lenses, and all bets are off.

A few weeks back, a fellow posted William Barclay’s commentary on the book of James.

“One of the great mysteries of social thought is how religion, at least the Christian religion, ever came to be regarded as ‘the opiate of the people,’ or how it ever came to seem an other-wordly affair, which neglected this world to concentrate on some world to come. There is no book in any literature with such a burning social passion as the Bible. There is no book which speaks so explosively and dynamically of social wrongs and social injustice. There is no book so burningly conscious that the great gap between riches and poverty is an active and terrible transgression of the law of God and the will of God. There is no book which has, in fact, proved so powerful a social dynamic as the Bible has. The Bible does not condemn wealth as such, but there is no book which more strenuously insists on the responsibility of wealth, and on the perils which surround a person who is abundantly blessed with this world’s goods.”

Another fellow responded to the tune of…

Honestly, I just can’t imagine how anyone can honestly read it and make those assertions. I’d be fine if that’s what it was, but I’d have to pretend that it said stuff that it doesn’t and it didn’t say stuff that it does.

I’m not saying that there is nothing good in it, but I just can’t even see how one can conclude that unless the conclusion was determined beforehand.

I bring this up leaving things anonymous, as I’ve heard similar things and and off for years from prosperity gospel leaning folks. And while James 5 and Matthew 25 are pretty explicit to me, cultural lenses plus the bit about us seeing things dimly may make it much less clear to others.

We can look at a whole multitude of arenas in a similar vein, where in one segment of Christianity sees the scriptures abundantly clear in support of A, but totally absent in the aspect of B, usually with respect to social issues, just as justice, racism, abortion, gay marriage, etc. Such divisions also occur in the theological arena, with Arminians on one side and Calvinists in the other. Things even break apart from the get go in Genesis with creationists on one side, and evolutionists on the other. We can even look at the scriptures and note splits in methods of interpretation, with different means of interpretation, and in some cases even the canon itself.

Its just crazy how divisive things are….

And yet, considering the disaster in Houston and SE Texas, there were no religious tests, there were no political tests, there were people in need, and lots of individuals in boats on a mission to rescue them… up to and including bunnies.

Heroes You Should Know: Brave Texas Teens Save Over 50 People In Small Fishing Boat

Christian Unity and Uniformity of Beliefs

You know trouble is on the horizon, when someone says, the Bible says it, I believe it, and that settles it without truly thinking things through. The Bible says a ton of stuff for sure… alas man’s leaning towards self-deception, man’s inability to see things clearly, and our old Adam zest for power muddies the water a great deal when it comes to how we interpret what the Bible says. 33,000 is a figure often quoted as to the number of distinct Christian belief systems… and yet within those belief structures, when you start asking questions at the pew level, you will often find even greater diversity.

Did God intend for potentially millions of different interpretations of the scriptures?

Genesis 11 suggests God has issues with too much like minded thinking. Ie, God’s confusion of languages and scattering of peoples with respect to the construction of the tower of Babel.

And yet, we have Jesus prayer for unity in John 17…

20 “My prayer is not for them alone. I pray also for those who will believe in me through their message, 21 that all of them may be one,Father, just as you are in me and I am in you. May they also be in us so that the world may believe that you have sent me. 22 I have given them the glory that you gave me, that they may be one as we are one— 23 I in them and you in me—so that they may be brought to complete unity. Then the world will know that you sent me and have loved them even as you have loved me.

So what gives with this… is God changing his tune, or do we have something hosed up in how we are reading this?

I think the answer in part is the trinity.

One issue in The Shack film, is the bit where in papa had the marks of the cross. For theological nerds, this heresy known as patripassionism is problematic as it makes the Son and The Father one, rather than 2 distinct persons. Ie, within the teachings of the trinity, Jesus is God, the Father is God, but Jesus is not the Father, nor is the Father, Jesus. For many folks though, this distinction is probably glossed over… on the surface it seems we theological nerd types may as well be arguing over how many angels will fit on the tip of a pin.

But this is key… the Father and Jesus are distinct persons. Consider John 17:22-23 taken to an extreme, is Jesus suggesting that we are to be God in the above text too?

And while I don’t necessarily think God’s plan was to have millions of interpretations of the scriptures, I think its also pretty clear his thoughts on being one do not equate to 100% uniformity in beliefs either. Consider the later part of Galatians 3 where Paul talks about oneness in Christ, there is no Jew nor Greek…. and yet Romans 11 is pretty clear that he didn’t throw the old covenant away with the bathwater either.

Its also helpful to ponder 1 Cor 13, where it talks about us seeing dimly, and the passing of gifts, ages, and time as well as growth in Christ.

And yet, people can have a intense need for certainty. Struggles with the mysteries of faith can become really hard at times…  The whole bit about working out your salvation with fear and trembling is not really applicable to the dude the Samaritan found alongside the road, the pilot who came within seconds of death, or the husband whose wife just died in his arms. In those times, Jesus is reaching out, just as he did for Peter, but it may not feel like such…

And while we do have certainty in the resurrection… the error is one where in we take said certainty from beyond the scriptures into our personal and/or tribal interpretations of said scriptures. Consider what could happen if one built their faith on rapture theology, and then learned about Darby later in life where in things start to unravel. And while basing ones relationship on the rapture is an extreme… building God into an exclusive box of ones own making generally doesn’t work out too well.

And for the box rattling that The Shack film brings about I am grateful.

A cool quotes from Anders Nygren on unity

Of unity in general:…..”The Gospel is so exceedingly rich that no section of Christendom can claim a full and exhaustive grasp of its richness. One church has grasped more of it, another less. One has penetrated to the central things, while another has remained to a greater degree at peripheral points. One has grasped one side the other another side. In this respect the churches can learn from each other and help each other to arrive at a simpler, richer and deeper understanding of the Gospel (N.L.C. New Bureau Release, June 30, 1947) ….